Side-by-side ball-and-stick renders of two ERR agonist small molecules, SLU-PP-332 and SLU-PP-915, in amber light on a dark background
Mindful Research

SLU-PP-332 vs SLU-PP-915: Related ERR-Agonist Research Compounds Compared

Updated By: Mindful Research Team3 min read

Key takeaways

  • SLU-PP-332 and SLU-PP-915 are two synthetic ERR agonists from the same Saint Louis University program, with completely different scaffolds.
  • SLU-PP-332: aryl hydrazone, C18H14N2O2, 290.32 g/mol, CAS 303760-60-3, ERR-alpha/beta/gamma pan-agonist.
  • SLU-PP-915: phenylboronic-acid thiophene carboxamide, C17H13BFNO3S, 341.2 g/mol, CAS 2285432-92-8, PubChem CID 142532359.
  • Only SLU-PP-332 is in the catalog; SLU-PP-915 is described here for comparison so that the two are not confused in a methods section.
  • For in vitro research use only.

SLU-PP-332 and SLU-PP-915 are two synthetic agonists of the estrogen-related receptors (ERRα/β/γ) from the same Saint Louis University research program, but they share no chemical scaffold: SLU-PP-332 is an aryl hydrazone (C18H14N2O2, 290.32 g/mol, CAS 303760-60-3) and SLU-PP-915 is a phenylboronic-acid thiophene carboxamide (C17H13BFNO3S, 341.2 g/mol, CAS 2285432-92-8). This comparison exists so that the two compounds are not confused with each other or with a peptide; only SLU-PP-332 is carried in the catalog.

Why compare them at all?

The "SLU-PP" prefix and the shared target make the two compounds easy to conflate in search results and in secondary writing. A researcher who orders one and reads about the other can end up with the wrong molecular weight in a concentration calculation or the wrong CAS number on a COA request. Setting the identifiers side by side removes that risk.

Identifiers side by side

Identifier SLU-PP-332 SLU-PP-915
Scaffold Acylhydrazone of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and 2-naphthaldehyde 5-aryl-thiophene-2-carboxamide bearing a phenylboronic acid
Systematic name 4-hydroxy-N'-[(E)-naphthalen-2-ylmethylidene]benzohydrazide [3-[5-[(2-fluorophenyl)carbamoyl]thiophen-2-yl]phenyl]boronic acid
Formula C18H14N2O2 C17H13BFNO3S
Molecular weight 290.32 g/mol 341.2 g/mol
CAS number 303760-60-3 2285432-92-8
PubChem CID 5338394 142532359
Heteroatoms of note Hydrazone N–N, phenol OH Boron (B(OH)2), sulfur (thiophene), fluorine
Target ERRα, ERRβ, ERRγ (pan-agonist) ERR family (later-generation agonist)
In catalog Yes No

Both sets of identifiers were checked against PubChem for this article. Note that the formula of SLU-PP-915 contains boron, sulfur and fluorine, none of which appear in SLU-PP-332; an elemental or high-resolution mass analysis distinguishes the two instantly.

How do the structures differ?

SLU-PP-332 is two flat aromatic systems, a phenol and a naphthalene, linked through a hydrazone. The hydrazone C=N bond is the molecule's reactive handle: it is formed by condensation of a hydrazide with an aldehyde and can hydrolyse back under acidic, aqueous conditions, which is why solution handling matters (see solubility and stock solutions). SLU-PP-915 replaces that linkage with a thiophene-2-carboxamide core, puts a 2-fluorophenyl group on the amide nitrogen and a phenylboronic acid at the 5-position of the thiophene. Boronic acids are polar, Lewis-acidic groups that form reversible esters with diols, a property that changes how the compound behaves in buffer and on an HPLC column compared with the hydrazone.

How do they differ as ERR ligands?

SLU-PP-332 is the reference pan-agonist: reporter-gene work shows activation of all three ERR isoforms in the sub-micromolar range, strongest at ERRα, and cell-based studies in myotubes show induction of the oxidative-metabolism gene program. SLU-PP-915 was reported later from the same program as a next-generation ERR agonist designed around a different scaffold; published in vitro reference values for it are fewer, and any potency figure quoted for it should be traced to a primary paper rather than a product page. For experimental design, SLU-PP-332 remains the compound with the fuller in vitro characterisation, summarised in what the published studies show.

Which should a laboratory use as a positive control?

For an ERR reporter or target-gene assay, SLU-PP-332 is the practical choice because its activity across the three isoforms is documented and the compound is available with a COA. It is used alongside an ERR inverse agonist (XCT790 is the usual example for ERRα) and a vehicle control, as described in controls and replicates in vitro. SLU-PP-915 is worth knowing about chiefly so that literature on "SLU-PP compounds" is read correctly.

Related research guides

Research-use note

All materials discussed are supplied for in vitro laboratory research use only, and are not for human or animal use.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between SLU-PP-332 and SLU-PP-915?

Both are synthetic agonists of the estrogen-related receptors from the same research program, but they are built on unrelated scaffolds: SLU-PP-332 is an aryl hydrazone (C18H14N2O2, 290.32 g/mol, CAS 303760-60-3) and SLU-PP-915 is a phenylboronic-acid thiophene carboxamide (C17H13BFNO3S, 341.2 g/mol, CAS 2285432-92-8). View SLU-PP-332

Is SLU-PP-915 a peptide?

No. Like SLU-PP-332 it is a small molecule with no amino acids. It contains a boronic acid group, a thiophene ring and a 2-fluorophenyl amide.

Which compound is the better in vitro tool?

SLU-PP-332 is the better-characterised pan-agonist, with a larger body of published cell-based data and a defined activity profile across all three ERR isoforms. SLU-PP-915 is a later compound with fewer published in vitro reference values; identifiers for it should be taken from PubChem rather than vendor pages. ERR agonist guide

Is SLU-PP-332 for human or animal use?

No. It is supplied for in vitro laboratory research use only.